The Lead Vaccine Developer [?] Comes Clean So She Can "Sleep At Night": Gardasil and Cervarix Don't Work, Are Dangerous, and Weren't Tested
Sarah Cain, The Health Wyze Report
Dr. Diane Harper was the lead [?] researcher in the development of the human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix. . . . She made the surprising announcement at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2nd through 4th, 2009. . . .
. . . Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low . . .
So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (V.A.E.R.S.) . . . At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. . . .
Clarifications / controversy over her reported statements :
An Interview with Dr. Diane M. Harper, HPV Expert
Marcia G. Yerman, Huffington Post | 28 December 2009
In this article, Dr. Harper seems to be clarifying a couple of points, but this article is full of significant statements–in black and white–and the same major point is made:
Do you believe that the Gardasil vaccine, as it currently stands, could present more risks to a young girl or woman than the possibility of cervical cancer?
“Pap smears have never killed anyone. Pap smears are an effective screening tool to prevent cervical cancer. Pap smears alone prevent more cervical cancers than can the vaccines alone.
Gardasil is associated with serious adverse events, including death. If Gardasil is given to 11 year olds, and the vaccine does not last at least fifteen years, then there is no benefit – and only risk – for the young girl. Vaccinating will not reduce the population incidence of cervical cancer if the woman continues to get Pap screening throughout her life.
If a woman is never going to get Pap screening, then a HPV vaccine could offer her a better chance of not developing cervical cancer, and this protection may be valued by the woman as worth the small [?] but real risks of serious adverse events. On the other hand, the woman may not value the protection from Gardasil as being worth the risk knowing that 1) she is at low risk for a persistent HPV infection and 2) most precancers can be detected and treated successfully. It is entirely a personal value judgment.”
At the beginning of the article, Dr. Harper is quoted:
. . . The most important point that I have always said from day one, is that the use of this vaccine must be done with informed consent and complete disclosure of the benefits and harms of Pap screening and HPV vaccines. The decision to be vaccinated must be the woman’s (or parent’s if it is for a young child), and not the physician’s or any board of health, as the vaccination contains personal risk that only the person can value.
As all of the information in the United States concerned Gardasil, since that was the only vaccine approved in the U.S. from June 2006 until this past October 2009, my comments have been focused on Gardasil. . . .
But the situation is the opposite of what she recommends, as governments, media, schools and doctors have been propagandizing and pushing this vaccine without adequate information about the risks–and minimal benefits–and also targeting a much younger age than what she recommends.
Another quote from the article, question and answer section:
Recent reports state that Gardasil may have triggered MS (Multiple Sclerosis) in some girls receiving the vaccine. What are your thoughts on this?
“Neurologists at the American Neurological Association have indeed concluded that Gardasil is temporally associated with autoimmune attacks on the neurologic system. The range of neurologic disorders is unknown.”
Who got to Dr. Diane Harper? Cervical cancer researcher retracts story warning about HPV vaccines
Mike Adams, Natural News | 12 October 2009
Many articles are included here. However, from what I can see, the Establishment-controlled media blew smoke about some inaccuracies–in order to confuse the public.
What do the vaccine reporting databases show as of 2013?
- Vaccines Adverse Event Reporting System (U.S. government)
- Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction Online Database (Canadian government)
- WebMedCentral: Dr. Diane Harper
Diane Harper, MD, MPH, MS is an internationally known researcher, clinician and educator in the field of HPV associated diseases, especially focused on the prevention of cervical cancer. She contributed to the sentinel research in designing and implementing the studies of both HPV vaccines, Cervarix and Gardasil, worldwide. . . .