Who Rules Canada? Privy Council Oath of service and secrecy
By Alan Mercer
As discussed in an earlier post, all members of parliament are required to take the Oath of Allegiance to the Queen, represented by the Governor General. At the Governor General’s website, we find a list of three oaths, including this one:
Oath of Allegiance
I, __________, do swear (declare) that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors.So help me God.
The second oath is:
The Oath of the Members of the Privy Council
I, __________, do solemnly and sincerely swear (declare) that I shall be a true and faithful servant to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, as a member of Her Majesty’s Privy Council for Canada. I will in all things to be treated, debated and resolved in Privy Council, faithfully, honestly and truly declare my mind and my opinion. I shall keep secret all matters committed and revealed to me in this capacity, or that shall be secretly treated of in Council. Generally, in all things I shall do as a faithful and true servant ought to do for Her Majesty.So help me God.
A third Oath is also listed, the Oath of Office–for Cabinet ministers–and this page explains how all three oaths work together when swearing in Cabinet ministers.
You’ll notice that each privy councillor swears to be a faithful servant of the Queen–to work for the Queen, not for “the people”.
On top of that, the privy councillor swears to keep secret everything they are supposed to keep secret.
It’s not a “theory”. This is what the oath says.
Who is on the Privy Council?
The Governor General’s website explains some details about the Privy Council:
. . . members of The Queen’s Privy Council for Canada, established under the Constitution Act, 1867 (formerly the British North America Act) to advise the Crown. The Privy Council includes all past and present Cabinet ministers, as well as a number of distinguished persons. Members are appointed for life . . .
This official information declares that the Privy Council includes current Cabinet ministers, which includes the prime minister. This means they have all taken this specific oath to serve the Queen and to maintain secrecy.
I don’t see where it says they are required to serve the people.
It says they are required to keep secrets from the people.
We’re talking about the prime minister, current Cabinet ministers, past ministers, and also a number of other “distinguished persons”, all of whom are appointed for life.
Here is a regime of secrecy maintained by the most powerful Canadians which continues decade after decade as long as each privy councillor lives.
All I’m saying is that when we hear about events and policies, and their explanations, there is plenty of reason to be skeptical.
Top politicians, along with other notable individuals, are bound together by oaths that require them to serve the Queen and to keep secrets.
These oaths cross party lines and successive governments.
There is no reason why you should think the prime minister and other ministers maintain any accountability to you or tell you the truth about what you need to know.
We can see them negotiate global agreements which nobody reads or asks us about, and we see them getting involved in overseas conflicts.
We’re kept in the dark about everything. None of us are involved in these decisions.
We’re living on pure wishful thinking to believe our best interests as Canadians are being served by people who swear such oaths and spend all their time rearranging the planet.
Value for value. If you appreciate this post, please donate a small amount to encourage more research and commentary.
Alan Mercer,
To begin with, I agree completely with your “Who Rules Canada?” statement, it is correct, and indisputable, but try to convince a Canadian, who was brainwashed in Canada’s compulsory education system, that what he believes is not the way it really is, and you have your work cut out for you. As children, living in a Monarchic Dominion, we were trained to see that situation as being democracy, and ourselves, as a “free and democratic society”. The quoted words are part of the 1982 Charter, and are linked to its granting of limited rights and freedoms, among which is the right to vote. Most ordinary working class Canadians, stand convinced and ready to defend, the right to vote, as being proof that Canada is a democratic country. Their basic grade school training has them believing, that they are being represented by the people they elect, when just as you have so clearly pointed out, elected politicians serve ONLY the monarch, and her system, which of course is an arms length dictatorship, managed by her sworn Agents in her Canadian realm. I was explain to a friend, that the situation is similar to Large Corporation, whose owner lives abroad, and has hired a local CEO, to manage the affairs of his company. Canada is basically a royal family business venture, its Prime Ministers hired CEOs, its Premiers branch managers, the MPs & MLAs, office managers, and observers. All of them owned outright by the Crown. Yet, the ordinary Canadian is oblivious to his captivity and exploitation, because his thinking was altered by an imperial master culture, for exactly that purpose.
I tell you true, if my pension was such, that I could donate to your (our) cause, I would do so, but as it is, I just scrape by. Take Care though! Jean
Thanks for the kind words! That’s well put, Jean.
I tend to think there is some hope. Maybe there are enough people out there to make a difference, who are capable of waking up from their false indoctrination if we can put more effort into nudging them along. They should notice the contradictions and pay attention to the facts that don’t fit with the dogma. When I was at high school, we were discussing the Constitution. I noticed the contradiction about the Queen when the teacher had to deal with the question about whether her position has real power or is just symbolic without power. There is constant double-think. I shrugged it off at the time.
The Queens power is real and she is no symbolic relic. The shores of Canada were laid claim to by the French side of the Royal Family before British/French war in Europe, The British won that war and the French king ceded the claim to the British king. Those land claims were blanket claims covering entire continents, limited only by armies superior to the claim maker. The boundaries we see today were established by negotiations between heads of armies as a means of avoiding the costs of war. That is how Canada became what it is, and the British Queen is head of state for Canada, it is extended British Royal Family, who actually owns the land claim which fell to their ancestor as spoils of war (to the victor goes the spoils 100%), and with the Royals it is both supremacy and property that gets passed down, and inherited, by the Family, where it stays. That is why the Queen of her own will cannot sell, or give away, the lands she reigns over, she doesn’t own the land herself, the Family does, and its holding company is the Crown. It is said, that the Crown holds the Crown land “in Right of Canada”, but since the Canadian People do not own Canada, and the British Royal Family does own it, it seems to me, that we the people are in fact landless serfs. Certainly we can never own even the lands we inhabit, because we inhabit them fee simple, meaning we rent them from the Crown, that is why on our land title papers, we are named as “Tenants”, fail to pay the rent, and you get evicted, the land goes back to the Crown. In a modern world, these feudalistic ideals should no longer exist, but they do, and I believe that no one is fighting it, because their childhood mental conditioning was so well carried out, that they unable to see through the delusion. Cognitive Dissonance!
Jean, many of mankind are trying to fight this and claim our rightful status of dominion over our life, liberty and property, but there is much confusion and training to overcome. I tell those I share my research with there are two lies you must overcome, 1- you are a resident and 2 – you are part of the public. We have been told these two lies our entire lives. There are Supreme Court Rulings that state it is not the citizen, it is the resident who is the taxpayer. We are private individuals who have accpeted that we are part of the public, but never ask how we got there as nobody else believes they are not supposed to be part of the public. The long version of public, is p’publkic trust’ where you gave up your dominion over your life, liberty and property for public benefits and priviledges which means you only have eequitable interest in your property, the government has taken the legal title and that is why they do whatever they want against you, they hold the 1 percent that is never talked about in property law. They always tell you that possession is 9/10ths of the law, but fail to finish the thought and tell you that the title holder is the other 1/10. So how did this all happen? From my research, it started with the creation of a title by your mopther called a Statement of Birth. She gave that to the Registrar, who upon acceptance, the crown became the trustee of this title to your estate under God. As trustee, they created a public taxable agency, appointed you upon application and gave you, the benficiary a certificate of title (small birth certificate). which when you used for the first time, became the registered agent of this public agency that is a legal name, LAST, FIRST MIDDLE. A man does not have any need for a legal name as he already has the capapcity when he become of age of majority. So upon application for the birth certificate, you asked for public benefits and gave up your dominion over your life, liberty and property. You were probalby legally incapacitated when it was done by a parent and I will aslo assume there was not full disclosure either. Your parents wanted the baby bonus and the vicious cycle of taxation of everything you did, began. THe bible actually tells us the dragon was waiting when we were born and captured us up. This means everyone has been equally yolked as persons. Erase mankind and replace it with personhood, the PM thinks it is called peoplekind, kind of like one of the people, but not man. The definition of person is in the Municipal Act. A person consists of these two things 1. an organization and 2. an agent, executor, etc and an organization always includes Her Majesty, (the government) as it is under their jurisdiction. This “person” is the resident as a man cannot exist in their legal jurisdiction, only a legal entity. This person is who at the municipal level is being taxed as an inhabitant, and at the provicial and federal level as a resident (in their jurisdiciton). THe bible tells us we must overcome what has been done to us, that when we become a man we must give up childish things, that the person must be redeemed and that this must be done through the living Christ. All Monarchies has a Christ figure for their people, and the Jesuits have been slowly killing off these descendants of King David, his bloodline. THe Jesuits have pushed this person agenda, as they have sworn to kill all liberals (free people). We must redeem this perosn and claim our title. It appears it may be through the privy council as that is what I was reseraching when I ended up here. Once the person is redeemed though the proper authority, if we are of age of majority, we will regain our dominion over our life, liberty and property as the laws allow in this Dominion of Kingdom under God, Queen Elizabeth, being the current Christ (anointed one and from the bloodline of King David). THe government was never to interfere with the people, their rights or their property, but they got one of our ancestors started down this road with a false sense of security offered by the government. You just had to become part of the public through their secret agency. I hope this helps others in their research.