Population Control Freaks
UK population must fall to 30m, says Porritt, by Jonathan Leake and Brendan Montague, www.timesonline.co.uk, March 22 ‘09
“JONATHON PORRITT, one of Gordon Brown’s leading green advisers, is to warn that Britain must drastically reduce its population if it is to build a sustainable society…
“The [Optimum Population Trust] will release research suggesting UK population must be cut to 30m if the country wants to feed itself sustainably…
“Rapley, who formerly ran the British Antarctic Survey, said humanity was emitting the equivalent of 50 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere each year.
““We have to cut this by 80%, and population growth is going to make that much harder,” he said…
“Many experts believe that, since Europeans and Americans have such a lopsided impact on the environment, the world would benefit more from reducing their populations than by making cuts in developing countries.…
[WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO DECIDE FOR ANYONE ELSE?]
“Britain’s population is expected to grow from 61m now to 71m by 2031. Some politicians support a reduction.
“Phil Woolas, the immigration minister, said: “You can’t have sustainability with an increase in population.”
“The Tory leader, David Cameron, has also suggested Britain needs a “coherent strategy” on population growth…”
Earth population ‘exceeds limits’, by Steven Duke, news.bbc.co.uk, March 31 ‘09
“…Dr Fedoroff has been the science and technology advisor to the US secretary of state since 2007, initially working with Condoleezza Rice.
“Under the new Obama administration, she now advises Hillary Clinton.
“”We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people,” Dr Fedoroff said, …
“Pressed on whether she thought the world population was simply too high, Dr Fedoroff replied: “There are probably already too many people on the planet.”…
“…the professor of molecular biology believes part of that better land management must include the use of genetically modified foods…
“Dr Fedoroff, who wrote a book about GM Foods in 2004, believes critics of genetically modified maize, corn and rice are living in bygone times….
“… asked if the US accepted its responsibility to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide, the gas thought to be driving human-induced climate change. “Yes, …”…”
It’s all about population. The elite – in their opinion – based on their reasoning – not yours – believe there are “too many people” and have started to revive this propaganda to a whole new level. The naive among us might imagine that it’s just impractical complaining without any “solutions”. And I’m sure they would love to hear from schmucks out there who have no concern for the self-determination of others and would beg governments for “solutions”.
But really, how should we interpret the fact that genetically modified seeds are being pushed on the whole world by people like this who believe there are “too many people”? We are supposed to believe that it’s a desperate attempt by helpless policy makers to help humanity thrive and produce more people? Get real … you can see how much they care for people by the number of bombs they dropped on Iraq, Afghanistan and Serbia, and by the sanctions against Iraq. And by the number of nuclear missiles they had pointed at hundreds of millions of people during the Cold War. That’s how much they “care”! Leaded gasoline was just a mistake supposedly – the regulators didn’t notice all those years, sure. All these wars, they just can’t help it! Governments care about us so much they always ask us nicely before they take our taxes to fund their bio-weapons labs.
And who among us can identify the genetically modified foods we buy in the grocery stores in Canada? Not labeled as such. No, I don’t trust the safety of genetically modified foods, and I don’t trust the resilience or safety of modified seeds and I don’t think we should be dependent on this technology. But does anyone ask us? No. It should be our choice.
She says they “MUST” be used. The Canadian government also decided it was safe so they shovel it out to us to eat – yes, the government runs everything and claims responsibility for everything to “protect” us, so it is the government, it’s just you didn’t know they were in the business of pushing GM foods. And these types believe there are too many people. So they want us to eat more GM food and be dependent on these crops surviving in different climates. And they worry about “food shortages”. Get it? Fill in the blanks.
Same with “reducing emissions of carbon dioxide”. Carbon dioxide is a natural clean gas that is necessary for plant life, and it is also necessary for a prosperous and healthy society, because all human activities – including breathing and heating our homes – require combustion and therefore the production of carbon dioxide.
So the bureaucrats and paid-off scientists concocted a story about “climate change” (supposed to be a bad thing) being caused by humans (rather than the Sun), because they want us to produce less carbon dioxide. Get it? Do the math. Less carbon dioxide, less production, less prosperity, less health care, less food, less people. More controls on our lives, less freedom (no freedom), less prosperity, less of everything, eventually controls on number of children, less people. It’s POLICY.
She said “we NEED TO CONTINUE TO REDUCE the growth rate of the global population”. Population reduction is not just a wish for them and it’s not “debated” about whether they are “God” and have the right to limit or interfere with the food supply, carbon dioxide production, or human reproduction. They are “God”. It is policy. And nobody is asking you for your input about any of these decisions. Wake up.
April 8th, 2009