Canada’s 5 big banks join anti-hate advertising boycott of Facebook
July 1, 2020 | Canadian Press
All five of Canada’s biggest banks are joining an international boycott of Facebook over concerns that the platform is complicit in promoting racism, violence and misinformation.
. . . spearheaded by organizations like the NAACP and the Anti-Defamation League . . .
Notice how everything is lumped together with “hate.” Anyone banned by Facebook ends up being associated with hate.
And these are allegations which should be proven in court if there is a crime involved. People are innocent until proven guilty under the old system or they were supposed to be. It’s called arbitrary dictatorial power. It’s replacing the old idea of individuals having laws and rights–including due process–(see the link to the Charter of Rights below).
But this is the new Brave New World system which is about technocrats making declarations.
This is the global Public Private Partnership system run by massive corporations.
It’s very clever to use Facebook as the scapegoat–it takes the heat for “profiting” from users trying to express their opinions–whatever they are.
Lumping different concepts together:
“One way we can do that is by standing against misinformation and hate speech, which only make systemic racism more pervasive,” AJ Goodman said.
Facebook already “began” taking down political posts “deemed to be fake or misleading.”
Notice how this article constantly mixes all sorts of concepts together with “hate.” But “hate” and “misinformation” are not the same thing. That seems to be an effort to confuse the reader and obscure the real intent.
So, if someone claims their product–like a vaccine product they are promoting through mainstream media and government propaganda–is being criticized falsely, then they label that “misinformation” and hey, presto–guilty!
And they use a lot of emotional manipulation in propaganda. Instead of defending their product and encouraging people to read the documentation and ask for proof of safety and efficacy, they create–over generations–a type of religious belief in their infallibility–leading to peer pressure and emotional guilt manipulation methods. This is very similar to how people pressure each other to adjust their lifestyle to COVID measures.
I got this attitude from a customer service person years ago when I said it was dictatorial of his gas company to impose smart meters: “Oh, how dare you! Don’t you know Gaddafi is a dictator!” because that’s all he was hearing at the time. “You should be grateful you’re not living in Libya.” Those weren’t his exact words but that was his idea of an argument because he had to defend the system he had invested in emotionally.
This is what everyone wants to do. People don’t want to believe there is a dictatorship being built up around them with lies and fraud–even if the economy is shut down and they’re told to stay in their homes.
This censorship effort involving Facebook is just theatrics–acting out a rationale to impose a pre-ordained system of censorship (like in the novel Brave New World or in 1984)–because more people are noticing the contradictions and problems with the financial system, with the misinformation in the mainstream media–for example, all the war rationalizations they helped promote with endless wars one after another.
And the other social and environmental agendas are about monopoly control, population control and domination over human beings also–with carbon taxes making it more expensive to live.
There is evidence of this population agenda in the 1970s Kissinger-sponsored Report which I have been analyzing–but it’s the same type of thing in UN “sustainable” documents, such as Agenda 2030, etc.
Now the new austerity economy is called the Great Reset (World Economic Forum).
They really don’t want us criticizing their “free trade” agreements, their hyper-immigration policies, their dubious “food”, their health, medical and psychiatric systems (MKUltra etc.), their wars, their special theatrical “events,” their new “ideas” about how supposedly malleable humans are when it comes to sexual identity, or when it comes to having us live surrounded with new RF frequencies for surveillance or having us accept nano-tech, gene-targeting “vaccines” and GMO organisms (from crops to mosquitoes). It’s as if someone is imposing Julian Huxley’s “transhumanism” on the world right now.
A certain level of corruption and blackmail would be required for that kind of coordination, and people are aware of the sex-trafficking that went on, for example, with Jeffrey Epstein. Today, his associate Maxwell was arrested.
I notice the article doesn’t mention any complaints against social media censorship over vaccines and COVID propaganda for example. The media should be unbiased and report on all sides of what’s actually happening, right?
The point of censorship is to suppress DISSENT.
A spokesperson for Facebook noted that the company has suspended more than 250 white supremacist groups
What’s the definition of a “white supremacist”? I don’t think any real group calls themselves that.
Hopefully they don’t mean groups who celebrate their ethnic identity and history. Lots of groups I notice of all colors have all sorts of things to say about their group and about other groups–whether it’s race, religion, etc. Usually we are only concerned about our own group’s point of view, I notice.
However, sometimes people might have something they feel is important to say, something that relates to their survival.
I think that is to be expected as we (everybody–all kinds of people worldwide) are being constantly harassed into accepting a single global non-culture–with concerns about food, concerns about vaccines, concerns about 5G, concerns about endless wars. Why is that happening? That doesn’t seem much like democracy.That is a lot to complain about. How do you make people stop complaining? Brainwash people. Intimidate people. Suppress speech.
How do we know who was banned and what they were guilty of? Was there a trial? There aren’t going to be real trials under a dictatorship. I guess someday they’ll have show trials if we let things get that far.
Maybe people who are being censored already “hate” pharmaceutical companies? Do they “hate” a technology of some kind? Do they “hate” some political movement?
What do you mean “hate”? Is that a valid, objective concept that you can put into law based on principles? I doubt it, but they try anyway.
Hate is a concept that has been worked on for a long time to in efforts to suppress dissent–just like the “war on drugs” (regardless of your view on “drugs”) was used to build up police and surveillance powers.
Speaking of Kissinger’s report, there is a law against genocide. What if a group had allegations of attempted genocide?
This COVID economic shutdown seems to me a lot like attempted genocide against the middle and working classes–of all races–causing mass unemployment, business shutdowns, and even preventing people from attending religious services. All of this is deliberate. Day to day life has been targeted with emergency “orders” and mass propaganda that actually succeeds in seducing people into altering basic behaviors–every aspect of their lives.
All of these efforts–including speech censorship (Event 201)–go against the principles Canadians were taught to follow in the past–which were rights and freedoms–as also described in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, just quoting one section:
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
. . .
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(a) freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.