Climate Change Propaganda, Dishonest Science as Policy Tool, Suppressing Scientific Dissent:
- www.washingtontimes.com, April 7, 2010 – Global warming’s unscientific method – “Ross McKitrick, an intrepid economics professor from the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada, has tugged apart the thin mathematical threads that once held together the story of climate change.” “Mr. McKitrick has spent the past two years attempting to publish a scientific paper that documents a fundamental error in the 2007 United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.” The policies to be implemented based on the IPCC report will cost the public billions. McKitrick’s paper was blocked by seven scientific journals. The IPCC report argues that temperatures rose over a century due to man-made Co2, based on an “adjusted” set of surface-temperature readings. However: “McKitrick found that factors unrelated to global climate contaminated this data set, resulting in a higher temperature reading.” For example, readings taken inside cities would be warmer than those taken outside cities. Quote from one of the East Anglia Climate Research Unit’s leaked emails by Phil Jones about excluding a paper by McKitrick from the IPCC report: “Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!”
Government Financial Policies, Austerity Measures, Government Debt:
- money.cnn.com, March 16, 2010 – No room for error on U.S. debt “What’s more, governments that wish to avoid credit downgrades may need to implement harsh and potentially unpopular policies. The Moody’s analysts, led by London-based managing director Pierre Cailleteau, wrote that “preserving debt affordability … will invariably require fiscal adjustments of a magnitude that, in some cases, will test social cohesion.””
Globalism, Strategies to Weaken Sovereignty, Mass Migration as a Weapon:
- www.mailonsunday.co.uk, October 25, 2009 – ‘Dishonest’ Blair and Straw accused over secret plan for multicultural UK – “Jack Straw and Tony Blair ‘dishonestly’ concealed a plan to allow in more immigrants and make Britain more multi-cultural because they feared a public backlash if it was made public, it has been claimed.” “Andrew Neather, who worked for Mr Straw when he was Home Secretary, and as a speech writer for Mr Blair, claimed a secret Government report in 2000 called for mass immigration to change Britain’s cultural make-up forever.”
- www.dailymail.co.uk, April 8, 2010 – Labour’s betrayal of British workers: Nearly every one of 1.67m jobs created since 1997 has gone to a foreigner “Figures suggested an extraordinary 98.5 per cent of 1.67million new posts were taken by immigrants.” “But Mr Green said the official figures were ‘the final proof that Gordon Brown was misleading the public when he promised British jobs for British workers’.” “The vast number of overseas inmates is a major factor behind the overcrowding [of prisons] which has led to the early release of UK criminals.” Instead of allowing slow influx of immigration, this kind of policy of massive influx of immigrants reduces cultural cohesion within the nation and therefore weakens – also economically as in this article – any potential resistance to attacks on individual rights and freedoms, and resistance to world government. So it seems evident to me that internationalist policy makers have been using this policy deliberately for decades in preparation for the new global corporate-feudal dictatorship they are setting up. The world state they want to create is uniform and uniformly submissive. They beat down opposition with accusations of “racism”, but it’s really about attacking our ability to maintain unique and strong cultures. A truly diverse world would have many different ways of doing things. The “progressive” social engineers steal the word “diversity”, but they don’t want diversity. People have been lured into depending on socialist programs, and then the same governments undermine those programs, very unfairly to the existing tax-paying population, with sudden mass immigration. If there was much less socialism, and much more concern about individual rights and justice, and people felt strong in their own situation, then Western societies could handle quite a bit of normal immigration in my opinion. But our own governments are all headed the other way.