Analysis of United Nations Agenda 21 – Part 9
Edited: October 10, 2023 9:45pm EST
The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it. Power is what all messiahs really seek: not the chance to serve.
—Minority Report: H.L. Mencken’s Notebooks (1956)
Document: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/Agenda21.pdf (Copy: http://www.canadianliberty.com/documents/Agenda21.pdf )
Continuing my discussion about NGOs and local sustainability or planning groups, Chapter 28 is about “LOCAL AUTHORITIES’ INITIATIVES IN SUPPORT OF AGENDA 21.”
According to 28.3,
Each local authority should enter into a dialogue with its citizens, local organizations and private enterprises and adopt “a local Agenda 21”. Through consultation and consensus-building, local authorities would learn from citizens and from local, civic, community, business and industrial organizations and acquire the information needed for formulating the best strategies. The process of consultation would increase household awareness of sustainable development issues. Local authority programmes, policies, laws and regulations to achieve Agenda 21 objectives would be assessed and modified, based on local programmes adopted. Strategies could also be used in supporting proposals for local, national, regional and international funding.
Do you notice how this isn’t focused on citizens only and getting input from them only?
The concept of mixing the voices of individual citizens with other organizations that drown them out is not valid democratically, but that is how things have been done.
And why should a municipality adopt Agenda 21 [or Agenda 2030] objectives? What if they don’t want to?
I think the answer is that the vast majority of our society have not been educated or trained to be involved in public decision-making, so those who have the power have just done whatever they wanted.
Very few ordinary residents and citizens have participated meaningfully enough in any level of politics, or in the court system or other aspects of government.
On top of that, they are not aware there is a global agenda guiding the actions of those different levels of government.
Also, those who think otherwise have been denigrated as “conspiracy theorists.”
Voting barely scratches the surface.
And voting for established politicians and parties highlighted by the established media is just perpetuating the same system of private, elite control.
That is how we have been conditioned to behave since we were born.
We leave government to the “experts,” whoever the hell they are.
And it isn’t just ideological stories which are the supposed reasons guiding experts, NGOs and politicians pursuing agendas.
There is also money and funding, and directions from higher levels of government.
And there are other types of life-long commitments in this world besides those.
Yes, this needs to change. You and others will have to want it to change.
The more severely our choices are restricted, and the more we feel the fire lit under our feet, the more we will want things to change.
Along the same lines, Chapter 27 is about “STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS: PARTNERS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT”
For example, 27.4 says,
To ensure that the full potential contribution of non-governmental organizations is realized, the fullest possible communication and cooperation between international organizations, national and local governments and non-governmental organizations should be promoted in institutions mandated, and programmes designed to carry out Agenda 21. Non-governmental organizations will also need to foster cooperation and communication among themselves to reinforce their effectiveness as actors in the implementation of sustainable development.
So, privately based, unelected NGOs, however they are motivated, however they are funded, work towards implementing these policies of SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT which is really just a code term for limiting natural human activity.
They are contributing to “programmes designed to carry out Agenda 21.”
We are just supposed to assume that “sustainable development” (same thing as Agenda 21) means something good when we hear about it, and most of the time we did not hear about it.
Do young people, encouraged to pursue careers, know enough about what they’re getting into when they consider jobs in government, in corporations, and in NGOs?
No. Nobody tells them otherwise. Everyone assumes all of this is legitimate.
Do most of them have a value system that counters all this? Apparently not.
Do you know that eugenics, transhumanism and population control (or Malthusianism) are value systems promoted by the elite for generations? On the “left” and on the “right.”
Do you know that there were always writers who opposed these value systems such as C. S. Lewis and G. K. Chesterton?
Some young people might have religious or political influences that come from outside the system, possibly from their parents or from the Internet. There are good and bad influences.
And it seems that good sources of information–and points of view–they could get from the Internet are being made more difficult to access as censorship is gradually being introduced.
How to sort through these topics without a sound value system that has been reinforced by their parents or teachers?
They need to use their reason, they need to use their intuition, their likes and dislikes, they need to go through the process of adopting fads and dropping fads. They need to question many of their teachers and much of the media, and think about what is fundamental. Time and effort and following their conscience.
Emotions like empathy, even anger, can lead to insights. Disgust with corruption and contradictions can reveal what is hidden.
Should we just cross our fingers and hope for the best? What is your mouth for? What is your keyboard for? Make it easier for them to hear the “truth.” Have an opinion.
If they are exposed to a different opinion, the wheels start turning and they can start to understand what the issues are.
I think a sound value system is not about elaborate systems of control. It’s about doing unto others as you would have them do to you. It’s about respecting the space, the conscience and the lives of others so that they can live without being harassed. That’s part of it anyway.
Is that going to be allowed? Is that on the cards? Not with this agenda.
Do you know we have laws and charters already? Do you know we have older laws and principles already that contradict what is happening, that are being broken by those in power?
So, in any case, speak up for yourself, communicate and reason with others, promote what is good.