Coronavirus – studies show it started earlier and much more widespread so information is skewed
Thanks to AW and others.
1. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11421049/coronavirus-outbreak-started-september-scientists/
Contrary to the official story, a University of Cambridge geneticist (Peter Forster) believes that, based on the number of mutations, the outbreak occurred “between September 13 and December 7.”
They say the virus acquires one mutation per month. The Cambridge team is looking at the origin of the outbreak being south of Wuhan.
2. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8212591/Coronavirus-California-lot-longer-believed-cases-early-DECEMBER.html
April 12, 2020 – Coronavirus has been in California ‘a lot longer than we believed’ with cases as early as DECEMBER
3. See another report on a California study:
https://ktla.com/news/local-news/l-a-county-officials-to-provide-latest-update-on-coronavirus-crisis/
April 20: While L.A. County reports total of 13,816 coronavirus cases, antibody study shows hundreds of thousands more could have had COVID-19 in the past
See Dr. Bhakdi’s statements (https://canadianliberty.com/dr-sucharit-bhakdi-explains-the-points-he-made-in-his-letter). He anticipated this would be the case. He explained that if the virus is widespread in the population, then the current extreme measures to contain the spread are pointless. He also said that if the virus is widespread, then it is going to be found in many people who have died already from other conditions. Also, the death count compared to such a large number because a much smaller fatality rate than predicted. So it is very comparable to flu deaths.
My conclusion is that we are not being allowed to interpret even the above reports correctly. We are being led to misinterpret information. We have been deceived by statistics–and it’s still happening every day.
This was the same reaction to the California study: John Roberts caught talking about the latest study and how low the threat is