By Alan Mercer

Continuing from Part 10

I’m making a note of some other documents for future reference:

WMA Declaration of Lisbon on the Rights of the Patient

I’m selecting a few points that have implications I mostly agree with–but these documents can probably be skewed towards other agendas:

While a physician should always act according to his/her conscience, and always in the best interests of the patient, equal effort must be made to guarantee patient autonomy and justice. .

If doctors don’t have a conscience–and many don’t I guess–I think it provides an opportunity for the “authorities” to substitute their own directions (laws, policies, executive orders, directives, propaganda-backed false realities).

Every patient has the right to be cared for by a physician whom he/she knows to be free to make clinical and ethical judgements without any outside interference

That’s good to remember! So, doctors aren’t supposed to be serving the instructions of governments and corporations! They’re supposed to have a conscience. They’re supposed to use their judgment. If people remembered this, then they can use this ethical argument against any health care workers who are pushing vaccines and drugs which they perceive as toxic. When the jobs of health care workers are being threatened if they don’t comply–outside interference by governments and corporations, with billions of dollars of tax money going to vaccines–then hopefully health care workers can also use this principle to defend themselves.

. . . The patient has the right to self-determination, to make free decisions regarding himself/herself. The physician will inform the patient of the consequences of his/her decisions.

A mentally competent adult patient has the right to give or withhold consent to any diagnostic procedure or therapy. The patient has the right to the information necessary to make his/her decisions. The patient should understand clearly what is the purpose of any test or treatment, what the results would imply, and what would be the implications of withholding consent. . . .

We should make a note of some of these principles while enough of us are “mentally competent” to do so. I don’t know if this code has been used in actual laws, but the legalistic loophole here is that term “mentally competent,” which no doubt is already abused in the case of many mental patients and seniors.

In the context of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, the lower-caste Deltas and Epsilons would probably not be considered mentally competent. When enough of the population has been damaged mentally, the “authorities” will twist words in this way to allow them to do whatever they want to them. [They already allowed them to be damaged, but in real life, they will never acknowledge that. In the novel, they were systematically damaged from before birth.] Yes, it sounds crazy and sick. That’s not too different from our real-life world. Have you read the stories about forced sterlization? Have you read the stories about how patients were injected with syphilis? Do you think we allow the world to be run by well-balanced people?

This series is based on the subject of doctors who have a conscience being ridiculed because they don’t want to participate in abortion and sterilization procedures. Maybe they don’t know it, but because of their religious or philosophical beliefs about the value of human life, they are actually refusing to participate in orchestrated population control and eugenics policies.

Because of how people perceive religious differences, we are trained to divide others and ourselves superficially into groups we like and groups we dislike. Instead of thinking, we just react automatically for or against certain formulas or dogmas. This kind of automatic response is created by the scientific application of years and years of targeted propaganda. I’ve summarized some of Jacques Ellul’s writings about propaganda.

Maybe our world doesn’t have to be as bad as it is –if we would just try and actually follow the principles of respecting the autonomy and conscience and lives of other human beings–following the Golden Rule in other words. If we insisted on this, then maybe we have some hope. But if our minds are twisted by the “zombie” films and TV series, and “pandemic” disaster movies, then maybe we won’t make it.

. . .

The unconscious patient:

If the patient is unconscious or otherwise unable to express his/her will, informed consent must be obtained whenever possible, from a legally entitled representative.

If a legally entitled representative is not available, but a medical intervention is urgently needed, consent of the patient may be presumed, unless it is obvious and beyond any doubt on the basis of the patient’s previous firm expression or conviction that he/she would refuse consent to the intervention in that situation.

However, physicians should always try to save the life of a patient unconscious due to a suicide attempt.

. . .

And I think that last point is also important, because it reinforces the importance of valuing human life–you know, like your own. You want others to value your life, right? So you should value theirs. What happens when you don’t? Follow the logic.

I just commented on a few of the points in this document. You can see that any document like this is a huge can of worms. As the preamble claims, the world keeps experiencing “changes”: “The relationship between physicians, their patients and broader society has undergone significant changes in recent times.”

So extremist change agents–useful idiots–mostly paid–are always begging to “change” moral documents (about autonomy and conscience, etc.), because society is always “evolving”– in the direction of sadism, which Huxley referred to as the “truly revolutionary revolution.” This means treating human beings as objects, as owned and modified according to the desires of the “authorities.”

Treating us as less important than the “government,” as less important than the “earth,” as less important than the “collective,” as less important than the latest lying headlines about the latest “virus” or tornado or whatever we’re told to focus on. We have our own lives to live, but somebody else thinks they have something more important to IMPOSE ON US.

So this is the kind of “radical” and “revolutionary” value system we live with more and more. The “authorities” scan us whenever they want in the name of “security,” or they seek to tax us out of our homes in the name of “climate change.” So they find an excuse and story to do things that are inhuman and immoral. Shutting down the woodstoves of people or invading our bodies at airports or injecting God knows what into our bodies (and really–only God knows what–because the doctor does not know–but we can know at least what is on the official package insert if we read it) — this sort of situation requires a world full of obedient slaves and deluded tools with NO CONSCIENCE, who DON’T VALUE OTHER HUMAN LIVES AND AUTONOMY AND IN EFFECT THEY DON’T VALUE THEIR OWN LIVES EITHER. So they end up serving legalized criminality.

So basic, logical, rational morality about valuing human life has been shoved into a corner and stigmatized and demonized as “religious” “bigotry”–because there is a huge power grab going on. And it’s as simple as that.

---

Continued

---

---