This Interview starts with one woman’s case from the 1960’s. It goes over the history of the eugenics movement and the involvement of the big Wall Street foundations. Sterilization programs continued until the 1980’s.
14 min 21 – Social workers were very aggressive in pressuring the mother to get her daughter sterilized. They used bullying coercive tactics of threatening to take away her benefits. This was standard.
15 min 7 – It was about targeting racial groups. Also it was about socioeconomics targeting of the poor and “unfit”.
15 min 35 – Eugenics was both about “improving bloodlines” and also about saving governments money, by preventing certain people from being born.
15 min 45 – 16 min 13 – The Supreme Court endorsed the practice. See the statement by Oliver Wendell Holmes. Then opposition “melted away”.
As well as the Supreme Court, the federal program against the Indians is mentioned also, so it’s not just many of the State governments. And it’s not just southern states.
There are some interesting questions that come up. One is the question about why these sterilization programs against the poor stopped?
Did people develop a conscience? Maybe some people got into office who were concerned about how this looked to the majority who believed in human life and value.
The law professor pointed to the past when questioned about the future.
Are they just gearing up for a more intensive version of the same thing? But now they have the new hocus-pocus of genetics, fear-mongering about diseases, brainwashing people against marriage and children through pop culture (already done), dehumanization, insurance programs, coercive methods of cutting people off from benefits or being able to survive or participate in the economy, mass vaccinations, etc. Due to Green propaganda about one-child policies and population, we’re just a couple of steps away from a society where reproduction is intensely regulated for the majority.
If the Wall St. elites pushed this in the past, why wouldn’t they continue?
I think it’s obvious from what the guests are saying that society is divided into two groups.
One group is the robber barron ruling classes who carry on their agenda in whatever way they can get away with, who ignore what used to be the general public’s morality.
The other group is the naive who are well-meaning and shocked by these anti-human programs when they find out about them (showing how history and the news media is controlled).
Many of us would be like most of the participants in this interview, who probably assume that society has moved on from eugenics and everyone agrees that it’s wrong.
Their views are well-intentioned pro-human basic moral values and are the same as the many people who who opposed the practice decades ago if they even knew about it.
But I’m also sure the views of the ruling section of society are the same as they always were since Plato’s Republic.
The only difference now is that naive people have given them enough time to collect our genetic data, build a police state, and have allowed them to spread their contaminating toxic values throughout our society.
Articles on Population Control – includes articles on sterilization programs internationally. How do you think they are funded? By dupes like us. What do you think taxes are used for? “Maternal health”. And drones and bombing campaigns too. That’s what corporate “socialism” is all about – taking over the world’s resources using its “right” wing and its “left” wing, playing parts of society off against each other so that they never get the point.