Corporate overlords planning your future in Toronto
Our Common Future 2.0, June 21, 2010 event in Toronto (http://www.corporateknights.ca/component/content/article/36-corporateknightsca/584-event-our-common-future-20/)
This event tomorrow in Toronto includes academics (unelected but receiving public funds), corporate representatives (unelected but often receiving public funds), NGO representatives (unelected but often receiving public funds) and a couple of politicians also (always receiving public funds).
We can see the post-democratic structure of “decision-making” emerge all around us. And “public-private partnership”. All it means is that you are not represented at all as an individual in important decisions. You just get to fund the decision makers – involuntarily through taxes.
Your opinion as an individual is irrelevant to the process managed by professional “experts”. The old democratic structure mostly gave you the appearance of having some input. Now you don’t even have that.
But you can pay your rising electricity bills and your taxes. And you can pay a couple of hundred bucks and go listen to them talk. And you can watch and listen to the news media lie to you every day about what’s important. We get to watch and listen. Good for us. But we’re probably not even doing that because of World Cup soccer.
“In advance of the G-20 meeting in Toronto, Corporate Knights and the International Institute for Sustainable Development will host this summit in honour of Jim MacNeill’s lifetime accomplishments in advancing sustainable development.
“The summit will be chaired by Maurice Strong, whose idea it was to marry the occasion of honouring Mr. MacNeill’s life’s work with a strong substance-based dialogue that lays down in no uncertain terms just what it will take to make the 21st century pursuit of sustainable development a success.”
According to the pdf (http://static.corporateknights.ca/OurCommonFuture-invite.pdf), Jim MacNeill was Secretary General of the Brundtland Commission (http://www.worldinbalance.net/intagreements/1987-brundtland.php) and principal author of its landmark report “Our Common Future”.
For example, the theme of the lunchtime dialogue is “Integrating sustainable development into decision making” and includes the following participants:
- Chair: Maurice F. Strong, pc, cc, om, frsc
- Galen G. Weston, Executive Chairman, Loblaw Companies Limited
- Mayor David Miller, Toronto
- Elizabeth May, Leader, Green Party of Canada
- Kathy Bardswick, President and ceo, The Co-operators Group
Sustainable development, Brundtland Commission, Agenda 21 – these just mean planning everything we are allowed to do in the future, including population control.
The machinations you see in the news every day from various kinds of institutions – and the controls we have lived under most of our lives, which are getting worse – this is “just what it will take” to make “sustainable development” – centralized control of all resources, including human beings – a “success”.
Canadians should see that taxes are only half of the story on how government people pay for their “G20” lifestyles. The other half is through central banking and the printing of monkey money. The assets of governments’ central banks are growing (by assets, you must understand junk debt) and the amount of money really created is even larger as the central banks allow for all kinds of leverage to their members (the major banks of course).
I would not demonstrate in the streets of Toronto because I have too much respect for private property and liberty of freedom to demonstrate that way. Actually, I cannot stand those who take control of the streets just because they want more government. I don’t want to be mixed up with pro-government demonstrators. I am actually wondering if the “Black” Anarchists are really anarchists; do they really believe that a government-free society would thrive or do they, like Harper and Obama, believe that without government society breaks down? To many so-called anarchists, anarchy is the way to topple governments they don’t like; to them anarchy is not their ideal. Many communists believe(d) in violence as a way to bring about anarchy, out of which a communist government will emerge. To them violence is the better way (versus election) to have the final political say.
I am not sure I’d rather be managed by the current “political leaders” or by those that would represent the demonstrative crowds today in the streets of Toronto.
If I had to protest today, I think I would go to Ottawa and protest in front of the Banque of Canada. Hopefully, we would not be too numerous as to not prevent pedestrians from walking the sidewalks. Maybe, make sure there is always a sign to explain what’s really going on inside that government institution.
Government is a criminal organization and those demonstrators in the streets are no better than the ObaBush of the world.
Speaking of some of the peaceful ones for a second, we know many of the “Green” “protesters” are funded by the international bankers, and are just asking for what the monopolists and bureaucrats want to push anyway, which is more control over every human activity on the planet. BP is one of the international corporations that pushes the Green agenda. International corporations and extremist environmentalists subvert legitimate issues.
The violent “anarchists” http://watch.ctv.ca/news/latest/the-mayhem/#clip318869 like these creeps breaking windows and tearing up Yonge Street (and the police aren’t there to stop them) – some of them are likely to be funded by the system also, in order to discredit all protesters.
It’s easier for average people to just be angry at all protesters, including harmless non-violent protesters, and scapegoat them rather than criticize the monstrous system that oppresses all of us, that stole over 1 billion dollars just to pay for “security” that can’t even protect stores from a few freaks. (And they also escalate the monetary scam you’re talking about).
The system uses all “sides”. Groups – left and right – are just tools used by these guys so that ordinary citizens can scapegoat each other – and be divided – so that attention is diverted from the powerful groups who are busily carrying out their international policies of wonderful sounding “Millenium Development Goals” etc, which are total power grabs.
http://g8.gc.ca/g8-summit/summit-documents/g8-muskoka-declaration-recovery-and-new-beginnings/
http://www.who.int/research/en/
All that some of the politicians do is provide a tiny token amount of resistance – usually not genuine – to the agenda pushed by powerful bureaucratic and corporate interests. We know that Clinton and Canadian globalist bureaucrats and NGO’s were all over Harper just because he wouldn’t fund foreign abortions as part of their population management agenda (dressed up as “maternal health” and “Millenium Development”). http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/action/ACPD-calltoaction-v2.pdf They’ve already laid out the agenda for the future and they hate it when someone diverts from it slightly, seemingly because he was trying to represent the interests of many Canadians.