The following episode is on transhumanism:
Pandemic Path to Transhumanism with Dr Tim Coles (audio) and the video version: The Defender Show Episode 35: Pandemic Path to Transhumanism with T.J Coles, Ph.D
T. J. Coles is “a post-doctoral researcher at Plymouth University in the UK where he studies the cognitive aspects of blindness and visual impairment.”
Books by T. J. Coles include the topics of neuroscience and politics, including, for example:
Your Brain in Quarantine
Where Does Prejudice Come From?
We’ll Tell You What to Think: Wikipedia, Propaganda and the Making of Liberal Consensus
Biofascism: The Tech-Pharma Complex and the End of Democracy
One of the topics Coles writes about is Wikipedia.
To make a point first about Wikipedia, my experience is that Wikipedia contains valuable information. It is convenient for building up a detailed picture of many topics. I would guess that its editors take pride in their work. However, it makes a perfect, reality-rewriting “memory hole” tool. Any article can be twisted in favour of the elite’s agenda.
Any subject can be twisted by re-categorizing it as “pseudoscience” or “conspiracy theory.” For example, somebody could be investigating the set of methods developed for self-help and manipulation (for both good and evil purposes potentially) called “neuro-linguistic programming (NLP). And then f they read the first line of the Wikipedia article, they discover that Wikipedia considers NLP “pseudoscientific.” Later in the article, “the consensus scientific opinion is that NLP is pseudoscience.”
This amounts to erecting a barrier to knowledge because many readers are likely to stop at the first line and not bother to read about the connection with many of the Esalen Institute’s participants.
The reader in this case wants to learn about a set of techniques and what they involve, or a toolbox in other words, or possibly an arsenal of weapons you might say. Calling the toolbox or theory or set of techniques a “pseudoscience” is an obstructing non-sequitur. Nobody asked if it was a science or not. Is a television a “science”? Is a car factory a science? Is even the ART of medicine a science? No, it’s not all science.
Readers didn’t ask for another label to be stuck to the topic in order to downgrade its importance and discourage them from investigating it. They would be better served by explaining the techniques first, then examples of how it is used, and then also explaining the evidence for and against the effectiveness and validity of its methods. Making such a declaration with a qualitative label in the first line without any intention to justify it is just Orwellian censorship. The article also refers to “consensus” as if that is a valid way of determining scientific truth. No, it is not. Consensus is not relevant to real science, only to scientific dictatorship.
One of the areas the corporate-controlled media attacks with religious zeal–using stigmatizing slurs and labelling–is criticism of “vaccines.” Vaccines are a tool of the globalist agenda, an agenda expressed in various books and documents, including United Nations Agenda 21 (see “Vaccines 1.1,” 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5).
One of the worst crimes of the dictatorship described in Huxley’s Brave New World is the systematic brain damage of the majority of the population to various degrees in order to create a caste system (Chapter 1). The elites don’t want people connecting that idea to the real world and medical products or food toxicity, etc. They don’t want people reading Survival of the Wisest by the supposed vaccine hero Jonas Salk. They don’t want people reading and understanding the intentions expressed in The Ghost in the Machine by Arthur Koestler.
Another crime of Aldous Huxley’s fictional dictatorship is how the “world controllers” control and censor “science,” including intellectual and scientific theories that question the dogmatic beliefs they want to impose on the population to degrade how they see their own value as human beings. This is explained also in Huxley’s Crome Yellow.
Children’s Health Defense is an American 501(c)(3) nonprofit activist group mainly known for anti-vaccine propaganda and has been identified as one of the main sources of misinformation on vaccines. . . .
The Wikipedia article on Robert F. Kennedy Jr. begins like this:
Robert Francis Kennedy Jr. (born January 17, 1954) is an American environmental lawyer and author who is known for promoting anti-vaccine propaganda and conspiracy theories. Kennedy is a son of U.S. senator Robert F. Kennedy and a nephew of President John F. Kennedy. …
Nobody is asking for Wikipedia’s opinion. When there used to be academic standards, if someone were to write an essay with an introduction like that, they would be expected to back up each point. These articles would have to be much longer in order to justify their claims. Otherwise their claims are worthless except to people who are impressed by appeals to authority. These articles should be objective, expository descriptions of the actual topics. There is usually a “Criticism” section that includes criticisms made by third parties with sources cited. Why isn’t that enough?
Wikipedia is still useful for those who have discernment, but it has also degraded itself into a propaganda tool.
Since COVID began, governments and corporations are pushing harder than ever on the buttons of censorship and propaganda.
Points of discussion in the interview:
1) Up to 9m 13: Outrageous statements in presentations made by Yuval Noah Harari, lead advisor to Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum. He says governments want to know what’s going on “under our skin.” I know that predictions about this type of surveillance were made in Jacques Attali’s book A Brief History of the Future (2006). Harari, for example, also states “there is no such thing as free will” and makes other types of statements, even about how many people there should be.
Kennedy laughs because it is so absurd and it’s difficult to convince listeners that this agenda is real and that these people are serious about it.
2) Refers to statement by President Eisenhower on the dangers of a scientific elite.
3) Refers to book: Beyond Freedom and Dignity by B. F. Skinner
4) Naomi Wolf (older site (https://drnaomiwolf.com/)) has also referred to the COVID phase as the beginning of biofascism in this March 2021 article titled “The End of America?” Her current website has a great deal of content about COVID.
5) Invasive medical procedures, the commercialization of human biology.
To be continued…