Comments on The Open Conspiracy by H. G. Wells
By Alan Mercer
From The Open Conspiracy and Other Writings, 1933, Waterlow & Sons Ltd., London
Continuing from Part 5 with Wells on the new world order:
“…the new directive organizations of men’s affairs will not be of the same nature as old-fashioned governments. They will be in their nature biological, financial, and generally economic, and the old governments were primarily nothing of the sort. Their directive force will be (1) an effective criticism having the quality of science, and (2) the growing will in men to have things right“.
No limits on their obsessive drive to control.
“The directive force of the older governments was the uncriticized fantasies and wilfulness of an individual, a class, a tribe, or a majority.”
None of that “uncriticized” “wilfulness”.
Ch. VIII “Broad characteristics of a scientific world commonweal”
“It is because we desire a unification of human direction, not simply for the sake of unity, but as a means of release to happiness and power …” (p. 34)
How do we interpret this? Plato’s Republic describes an idealized society with an elite class of “guardians” in charge, and this is what New World Order promoters have in mind. This is their formula and ideal. To suppress individual will and freedom for most of humanity in order to empower and “release” a few from normal biological and economic limitations.
As with Aldous Huxley‘s Brave New World, Plato‘s Republic concerns itself with the breeding of human beings for different roles, i.e. eugenics. As mentioned earlier, Wells says the new kind of world State will be based fundamentally around biology and economics. “Biological” means State control over reproduction and genetics. Regardless of what Wells had in mind, it could also refer to technological means of interfacing with the human mind and body for control, tagging, monitoring etc.
A sense of this kind of future is portrayed in the movie Code 46, which portrays genetic engineering, cloning, strict reproductive laws and restrictions on mating, forced abortion, computer-human monitoring of personal lives, the manipulation of memory and moods, as well as direct economic control of travel through insurance tags.
As far as genetics goes, note that the 2010 Canadian federal budget gives special attention and tax money to a group called Genome Canada. This public-private partnership supports “large-scale genomics and proteomics research projects” in the areas of “human health, agriculture, environment, forestry, fisheries, and new technology development”.
Where does it lead? We have biology and economics: the human body, food, fuel, resources, genetic tags, measuring, counting, cataloguing, taxing, licensing, monitoring. Control. To tag is to claim ownership and control. Is it control by you and me over our own lives? Is it? Really?
And they say they’ll consider all the ethical and social issues. But taking money from Canadians (taxation) is unethical in the first place. Diverting tax money towards pet corporatocracy projects is unethical. Diverting tax money towards the re-engineering of life on this planet is unethical. Not asking Canadians for permission to pay Genome Canada this money is unethical. I also think that seeking control and power over others is unethical.
But that’s just my “wilfulness” to say that. So they’ll do what they’re paid to do, whatever they want to do.
How many decisions did you make this week about Canadian resources by the way? If the government didn’t ask you for input, then who is directing the future and all these agendas? Not you and me. But if it’s not you and me, then what is the ethical basis for the government doing anything at all with our resources? What right do they have to partner with special private groups and fund the direction of technology, to the exclusion of most Canadians?
Empowerment of the people depends on maintaining property rights, meaning the right to make our own decisions for our lives and the resources we use.
There should NOT be one direction for humanity. There should be MANY directions, MANY people in charge of their own lives, making their own decisions, who set their own ways and protect their own rights.
Privileged groups who are running amok and using governments, playing God with biology and tampering with genetics, are a direct threat via contamination to OUR property rights, to our land, our resources, our homes, and our bodies.
How can any of us just accept things like this, and take this at face value, as if these private and international groups care about our rights!? It’s ridiculous what we put up with. This is just one small but dangerous example of what goes on with OUR TAXES while we remain UNINFORMED by government and mainstream media.
Value for value. If you appreciate this post, please donate a small amount to encourage more research and commentary.