Human engineering – eugenicist's proposals sinister and hilarious at the same time – induce meat intolerance, produce short children, alter brain with drugs
By Alan Mercer
Hand-made humans may hold the key to saving the world | www.brisbanetimes.com.au | Matthew Liao | September 30, 2012
“Matthew Liao is the director of the bioethics program and an associate professor in the Centre for Bioethics in the Department of Philosophy at New York University.”
The premise of article is standard establishment-approved B.S. fear-mongering about “human-induced climate change”.
The article admits there are scientists and policy makers seriously talking about geoengineering, in other words spraying the atmosphere and oceans with particles using this alleged crisis as an excuse. As if they haven’t been doing it already.
The author writes:
“I propose that we consider another solution to the problem of climate change … potentially less risky than geoengineering. … “human engineering”. It involves the biomedical modification of humans to make us better at mitigating, and adapting to the effects of, climate change.”
“… intended to be a voluntary activity – possibly supported by incentives such as tax breaks or sponsored healthcare – rather than a coerced, mandatory activity…”
As if he decides how the policy will be implemented! Anyway, lying or fraud is a form of coercion. Taxing people in the first place is coercion, so targeting tax money with bribes/rewards to people who are dependent on money (most people) is part of coercion. And the healthcare systems are more and more coercive.
His four suggestions are:
1) Apply patches that discourage people from eating meat. Induce “mild intolerance to red meat by stimulating the immune system against common bovine proteins.” People who are treated this way have an unpleasant experience after eating meat.
So the vegetarian agenda continues. The propagandists blame cattle for producing so much methane. But there have been herds of bovine creatures and other types of large animals spewing methane (and carbon dioxide) for millions of years – naturally. Methane is a very clean fuel. And the plants love the carbon dioxide! So it’s all bogus. But people are trained to believe lies by their education system and the controlled media. The real goal is to create a perfect slave “utopia” as in Plato’s Republic.
“Climate change” seems to be a one-stop shop excuse for the totalitarian policies which are not covered by the “War on Terror”.
The slave class won’t eat meat. And they won’t be allowed to reproduce freely either:
2) Encourage parents to have shorter children. They use less energy and have a smaller “carbon footprint”. Reduce the average height in the U.S. by 15 cm. This could be done by destroying embryos (“selection”), hormone treatment and gene imprinting.
3) Use “cognitive enhancement” in order to reduce birth rates. This means using drugs that alter the brain. If we can get the children on drugs that cause them to literally sit still and listen obsessively to propaganda, they will use proper contraception like proper obedient slaves. Guaranteed reduction in population.
People are already on plenty of psychiatric drugs (and fluoride). So we’re already entering Huxley’s Brave New World. Each of these proposals involves drugs at some stage.
4) Use drugs to induce “altruism and empathy”. This was portrayed in the movie Code 46. For example, the hormone oxytocin makes you “more willing to share money with strangers”. In other words, with the government.
“… interventions affecting the sensitivity in these neural systems could increase the willingness to co-operate with social rules or goals…”
He also mentions “reducing our need for food and water”.
The punchline is he claims this approach could give us more “liberty”. Instead of restricting the number of children as in Communist China:
“… given fixed allocations of greenhouse gas emissions, human engineering could give families the choice between having one large child, two medium-sized children or three small children.”
He says, “It may turn out that human engineering is not the best way of tackling climate change.” But they want us to go along with everything just in case.
Value for value. If you appreciate this post, please donate a small amount to encourage more research and commentary.
All of his “solutions” will cause health issues… ie make people sick. Stunting children’s growth causes health problems, we are omnivores and need to eat meat and making our species meat intolerant will make us sicker and weaker in the long run, genetic mod patches that change our immune system will cause health issues (not getting necessary nutrients from the meat as well as possible genetic mutation or damage) , most of these will be termed “side effects” probably like with regular medications but the results will be a sick chemically imbalanced and genetically mutated/ damaged body. Also putting people on drugs to make them docile and tranced to be open to suggestion is coercive and will make us sick, screw up our brains AND make us their slaves at the same time. All of this is not healthy, is not safe and needs to stop!
Anyone wondering what I’m talking about, there are many documentaries talking about all this, please look this stuff up!
And I’m not going to feel guilty for breathing out CO2! It’s crazy to blame any living thing for breathing as a threat to the eco-system! Insulting too!
We could change our farming methods a little to treat the animals much more humanely, that I would like… however I understand we need to eat meat and fish for our brains to work correctly, so I cannot back veganism. Our bodies are not designed to eat just plants all the time. I see that some vegans are very healthy on a vegan diet, but I know our bodies are designed to eat both meat and fish and animal fats and proteins are needed for our brains to work right.