I just figured out what they mean by the “scientific method”
I realize now what people mean when they are glorifying “science” and claiming that someone is stupid and anti-science because they don’t believe the media and education system’s version of reality.
The “scientific method” doesn’t refer to testing and evaluating the evidence for a theory. It actually refers to the following method:
1. LISTEN
2. BELIEVE
3. OBEY
And that’s why it is so appropriate that the climate conference in Paris is called “COP”, as in:
DO WHAT THE COP TELLS YOU TO DO.
That’s “science.” It’s an easy 3-point method, and we learned how to analyze opinions scientifically in school and through TV, haven’t we children:
No need for “stupid” to use your brain. Dumb-dumb’s brain don’t work too good. So smart people listen to Elon Musk, as he got billions. He very smart.
1. Listen. Pay attention to those who have been set apart as experts.
2. Believe. Believe what they are saying while they are on their platform. They’re all dressed up. They get plenty of money because whatever they say is so true. Truth can be judged by the amount of money from foundations someone is spending on their activities at a climate conference. The more money, the more “science” and “truth.” That’s how you can tell the best, most “scientific” protesters. They spend the most on signs and props.
3. Obey. They have scientific “solutions” for their “problem,” (creating a world government, I mean, trying to stop the weather from changing) like CARBON TAX. So, make sure your government imposes a new carbon tax and don’t listen to anyone who says that this will drive the poor and elderly out of their homes when the winter gets too cold to afford the energy that comes with the carbon tax. That’s anti-science to use logic like that. There have been news stories from Europe about the elderly having to ride the bus all day in winter because of energy prices, but don’t connect the energy prices to the carbon tax they have in the EU. Only bad anti-science people would think that the carbon tax would be raised to the point where you might not be able to afford your single-family house and the gasoline for your car.