Ignatieff says Canada should set up cap-and-trade system with or without U.S., Canadian Press, www.google.com, Nov. 26/09.
Both parties are pushing carbon controls, playing their games of pretending to oppose each other, with the Conservatives even pretending to have nothing to do with it.
And Ignatieff tries to play the pro-Canadian card, pretending Canada will actually do this independently of the international government that is taking shape in front of our eyes! Yeah, right.
If his proposal is followed, we will ALL PAY if businesses “pass a certain emissions level” of a clean odorless life-giving gas called carbon dioxide – which is an unavoidable product of heating our homes and fueling our vehicles – or of producing expensive “alternative energy” products or of manufacturing clothes or of cooking our food – in other words an unavoidable result of our survival.
We also breath it out. Do you think maybe they will introduce a penalty for having “too many” children eventually? The ruling class would love to do that if they could get away with it. Actually nobody is stopping them from moving in that direction.
Which businesses do you think will go under first? Smaller independent ones of course. And everyone’s costs will rise, and there will be less of everything! And for a few people, they might actually make money off of those who have to PAY more. Hence the “trade”. The losers who “emit too much” can “trade” – by government coercion – their money to a handful of very rich people who might actually escape losing money like everyone else. It’s the public-private-partnership system where they have it all worked out for the new kind of total parasite – or suckers – who think they will profit as others go under – completely under – because of a lie.
What a disgrace we are being lied to and blamed for “global warming”, and they plan to rob us blind based on their fable.
Ignatieff and his godlike buddies also plan to maintain the earth’s temperature below a certain level. A new make-believe imperative for a new religion of total control. It wouldn’t occur to normal people. But they’ll keep repeating absurdities until we believe in them.
Ignatieff vows climate-friendly legislation (http://www.canada.com/business/Ignatieff+vows+climate+friendly+legislation/2269257/story.html), Canwest News Service, canadian.com, Nov. 26/09.
What these people have done over the last few years is redefine the term “pollution” to mean gases that are “trapping heat in the atmosphere”.
Using that logic, it must mean that water vapor – another product of combustion – is the biggest “pollutant” of all, because it’s a much larger contributor to greenhouse gases, whereas the quantity of carbon dioxide is minuscule.
Are you prepared to label water vapor a “pollutant”? If not, why not? Go for it. Explain to me why we should not be punished for emitting water vapor too. Which is “cleaner” – carbon dioxide or water vapor?! Try to answer that.
Also, let’s label the oceans as “polluters” also, because they emit massive quantities of carbon dioxide. Also the decaying vegetation and animal matter in the forests, let’s label all these non-human entities “polluters” or “sources of pollution”, because they emit huge quantities of carbon dioxide.
Are plants and trees that require the intake of carbon dioxide to survive – are they enablers of this so-called “pollution”? Or do climate change scam promoters not have any consistency at all?
Do I have to spell it out for you? We are being LIED TO. And it’s all about US – about controlling human beings – not helping us. To these people, WE are the enemy. We are taking up too much space!
This international club that trains people like Harper and Ignatieff to distract us with trivial distinctions – are introducing a society – a world government – of total control over everything in our lives.
A lot of us were NOT indoctrinated with this rubbish when we were children, so it doesn’t “take” with some of us. But this is being shoveled into your kids’ heads right now at the “education” centres you send them to.
Paying penalties or taxes means less carbon dioxide emission and it means less production of everything, including everything we need to survive. What kind of future does that lead to if we are penalized for our own survival?