The values and oath of the Ontario Provincial Police
“The Promise of the O.P.P.” (Values and Ethics) September 2002
The whole document is significant and I am just singling out a few points. This one is about ethics. Page 3:
I will:
•Have the courage to confront those who violate democratic, human and civil rights of others
And this is from the Preamble to the Oath of Office, Page 5:
Exercise leadership responsibilities consistent with goals of achieving Justice, applying the Rule of Law, maintaining a strong Moral Core, and respecting Human Dignity and the Democratic Principles upon which our society is based
Oath of Office:
I solemnly affirm that I will be loyal to Her Majesty the Queen and to Canada, and that I will uphold the Constitution of Canada and that I will, to the best of my ability, preserve the peace, prevent offences and discharge my other duties as a Commissioned Officer, faithfully, impartially and according to law.
I think there are contradictions in everything like this. If you read through the document, it might help you resolve these contradictions to your own satisfaction, using your own conscience.
Here is part of the Constitution: https://canadianliberty.com/canadian-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms/
I hope I can shed a bit of light on this.
The Dominion of Canada is a constitutional state, where each individual has the right to be free. This implies one is not free until the right is claimed.
In the 20’s and 30’s some major changes took place in the law regarding what a person was. Up until this point only men could be persons. This has to do with entering a public office and being a public officer under the public trust. Some women demanding “suffurage” or the right to vote demanded that women be recognized as persons also. McClung was one of the “Famous 5,” a group of women who in 1927 petitioned the Supreme Court of Canada to have women declared “persons” and therefore eligible for public office as senators. The court decided against the women, but the British Privy Council — at the time Canada’s highest appeal court — overturned the decision, officially declaring that the term “person” included women. person=”eligible for public office”
This was just a precursor to what was to come in the “NEW DEAL”. The governments as a result of the Depression decided they were going to take care of the people. The problem was they had no right to interfere with the people’s lives, their liberty or their property.
In order to overcome this trespass upon a private individual, they had to make it so one consented to be part of the public through a legal fiction called a person. In order to accomplish this the democratic governments had already begun recording the people’s birth in what is called a statement of birth. This is a title to a Christian estate under God. It is held by the Crown who is the trustee of this title. Upon application for a “birth certificate” an organization is birthed into the public trust and the one holding the certificate becomes the registered agent for the government agency. The trustee now become the principal of the agency. The individual now had the status of a child. This is how they interfered in the individual’s right of dominion over his life, liberty and property.
Since the constitutional state is a common law jurisdiction, they had to overcome property rights also. It is my belief that all the provincial governments and the Canadian government registered as corporations with the District of Columbia, allowing them to use municipal jurisdiction, which is foreign law to the constitutional state.
So in order to participate in the public trust, an individual had to give up his right of dominion in exchange for government benefits and privileges. This split the title and is why you only hold certificates of title (9/10 possession) and the government hold legal title (the other 1/10).
So in short, there are two Canada’s, one is constitutional, the other corporate, hence two oaths. If they can prove you are participating in the democratic public, then they use public policy on you as you are under the corporate state. If you have overcome the assumption and presumption you consent to be bound by public policy, then you have all your rights intact and are standing on the constitutional state.
The best way to “overcome” a “promise to perform” is to sign above your autograph all your contracts “without prejudice”. Here is a link to secure your rights by correcting your status with a passport signed correctly so you make no promises to perform under public policy as a person.
http://www.coppermoonshinestills.com/id71.html
Read pages 10-13 for the power it has. The best way to apply for a passport is to use the statement of birth. All the places you sign must be qualified “without prejudice by: autograph”
You may need to read this also to GET it.
Book: Without Prejudice, Sovereign Covenant by William Dixon
I should add that a person is defined was defined in the municipal act as an organization and a person and that an organization always includes Her Majesty. That is until they removed it. Her Majesty is the registered owner of all legal names. If you claim to have a legal name, then they give you the liability, even though it is not yours. The only title you can claim in the public or any court of law is “I am merely the registered agent for Her Majesty’s organization”.
Hi Troy, thanks for your comment. It is worth looking into. I can’t say I follow what you’re saying so I would need to study it. I replied to your other comment here. https://canadianliberty.com/here-is-the-oath-for-ontario-lawyers-hold-yourself-to-it-and-defend-rights-and-freedoms-share-your-contact-information/ – A couple of points: 1) My view on this when I write is that the rights and freedoms document I’m referring to (the Charter) which I believe overlaps with God-given principles is that I believe there is a moral obligation on people as human beings to look out for each others’ rights. And that’s the practical sense in which I look at these concepts or oaths. I was impressed that the OPP oath didn’t just follow an oath to the Queen but was also concerned with the rights of the people. So, in a moral sense, I believe that many many people can understand what I’m saying. And that may be enough to make a huge difference in pushing back this global slave project which has advanced over the last hundred years or so since H. G. Wells and Aldous Huxley and people like that started to formalize their agenda. When we do that we will automatically create something outside of this evil malevolent agenda. So I look at things in terms of what is naturally human, how humans perceive the function of law in a common sense way–not the laws as they are written but the laws as they should be. And I think that’s the concept I have for an alternative future–which we may have to adopt in the immediate future in order to have any future. And 2) my second point is please explain how to apply your concepts to the COVID crisis situation and what to do about detention camps etc. Maybe you can explain in more comments or in a separate post and can provide a link or whatever. 3. I plan on appealing to peoples’ sense of right and wrong, their understanding of rights and freedoms. I don’t put any trust in institutions–if you were getting that impression that’s not my way of looking at things. I see humans as having a lot of potential to do the right thing. That’s all. And maybe that’s something.
i’m a bit confused. why does your post talk about Canada(The best way to “overcome” a “promise to perform” is to sign above your autograph all your contracts “without prejudice”. Here is a link to secure your rights by correcting your status with a passport signed correctly so you make no promises to perform under public policy as a person.) but give an American Passport?
Lots of police are breaking their oaths Feb 18,19 2022 in Ottawa Ontario. Failure to uphold the constitution of canada is criminal behavior. Please publicly remind officers of their oaths and warn them.PLEASE
I was there at the time. So many people were telling officers “remember your oath” and about their promise to protect. For the most part, it did about as much good as talking to a bunch of stones. BUT there was at least one cop who turned and joined the protestors and immediately got arrested. I did hear of at least one other cop that started crying and said that he would not be back the next day.
It is a given according to scriptures that all men are liars and only God is true. I can tell you that this oath has been, is and will be violated by most of those who swear it and thus commit perjury. A mere glance over the picture exposes this truth. One can read of law enforcement who are rapists, liars, bullies, cowards, thieves, conspirators, and of course oath breakers.
The break down/decline in the ranks of law enforcement started as did most things bad, in 1969 when the father of the current slime minister legalized murder by aborticide and homosexuality, obligating the police to condone these two acts of criminality against God and man. Criminal hypocritical and statist disorganizations such as the CHRC and its unconstitutional Section 13 were created by Pee Error Trudope and from there on things went downhill.
At this juncture in time we have a so called justice CYSTem where there is no justice and everything is corrupt especially law enforcement who so willingly have transformed into stalinist stooge criminals with the exception of the RCMP that with some problems still manages to be the best there is compared to the OPP and hundreds of city and regional police forces.
One will find collusion twixt/amongst corrupt bureauCRAPcies, officers of the court, corrupt police all the way to the top and political hacks.
A uniform does not eliminate the tendency to the wearer to be evil and proof is easily found online. I have talked to many retired officers who admit that they are happy to be and all is going to hell in a hand basket with the CYSTem. We have seen the Ottawa Police Services trample by use of their police horses people including a disabled elderly woman on her access scooter. We have noted the murder of a semi retired elderly gunsmith by Toronto Police Services. We have seen OPS transform to stalinist stooges and the slime minister enact an emergency act illegally and solely to soothe his cowardly and criminal ego.
I have proof recently offered by the perp of his gross violation of his oath. There are few if any good cops left and upholding the law is not their focus. As in all things the Truth will out in a specific injustice perpetrated and carried out by the CYSTem which will be a national scandal and embarrassment to the CYSTem. The ring leader who as a cowardly soy boy hid behind a woman’s skirt for decades and committed serious CCC and Charter rights violations that will come back to haunt well over a dozen criminals who made the mistake of thinking their target was a sheeple. The gears of Truth turn slowly but they do turn and in the end the devil gets his dues. It has been thought if not suggested that the kingpin in a crime against two innocent people over decades died suddenly and mysteriously at his own hand but I am sure the cause of death came from the corrupt CYSTem.
Time tells all things and this situation will be no exception.
I think beliefs have been altered so that people are more divided. But in practice, they’re the same human beings and don’t understand all these social changes in the same way. It doesn’t mean past generations were right about everything either. I’m glad you have some positive outlook about the truth over time. I don’t think we know that there are so few good police. I think it would vary with each police force. Maybe there are a lot of well-intentioned ones who want to do their best and don’t understand bigger pictures, and who do their best to do the right thing, like most citizens try to do (sometimes the pressure to conform is overwhelming as many discovered). That’s the point of this post is to appeal to principles that many will understand, so that we move things along ourselves in the direction that we want rather than wait for law-breakers to reform things which they’re not going to, because they’re part of the big agenda. Retiring early is part of the problem for every profession. The oligarchy is very serious about intimidating people into thinking their agenda is inevitable. But it’s not, because most people will end up deciding it’s not livable, and not something they want anything to do with. People have been trained in multiple generations to be passive, compliant etc. to supposed authorities but that’s not the way to be. These authorities have been involved in other evils for many decades, MKUltra for example. I think it’s best to not see all the differences in beliefs but to see what we have in common so that we are not divided and defeated the way they intend us to be.