2:00 Gates praises the totalitarian Chinese lockdown measures.
3:00 Gates: “We’re going to have this intermediate period of opening up and it won’t be normal until we get an amazing vaccine to the entire world.”
He refers to “our partner” IHME at healthdata.org:
“The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) is an independent population health research center at UW Medicine, part of the University of Washington, that provides rigorous and comparable measurement of the world’s most important health problems and evaluates the strategies used to address them. IHME makes this information freely available so that policymakers have the evidence they need to make informed decisions about how to allocate resources to best improve population health.”
So it sounds like this other unelected organization as well Gates are involved in deciding what is healthy for the “population.” I think there are other points of view from many citizens that would need to be available to policymakers too, but I think we are drowned out in billionaire-funded propaganda that demonizes animal foods such as meat, eggs and dairy. There is an alarming and blatant demonization of dairy foods going on as of September 3, 2020, which ties right in with the elite’s attempts to undermine animal food sources, which we must counteract in order to shore up our food supply and health in this economy. There is sound information available on healthy, traditional animal foods. Gates is heavily involved in “food” innovation in addition to vaccination and education.
Establishment institutions of all kinds are promoting COVID-19 as a higher health priority than cancer, diabetes and tuberculosis, and I think everyone has noticed that, but it doesn’t mean this message has any truth or moral validity. It’s just a mechanism for establishing tight control over human beings.
The interview is dictatorial craziness.
7:50 At 8:45 Gates refers to lower demand because of
“ . . . many people losing their jobs and entire industries will be operating at a far lower level than in a normal economy.”
Gates has the nerve to talk about the ruined economy as if he and his friends weren’t involved in getting governments to shut it down (see grantees below) using their stories. He says we won’t be able to go back to normal life until there is a “miracle therapeutic” (actually already known, effective treatments are being suppressed) or broad usage of a [hypothetical] vaccine.
9:00 Host, Becky Quick, asks about the Gates Foundation.
“. . You agreed that you are going to spend more than a hundred million dollars on this. Where is that money being spent? . . . “
So his power comes from his foundation’s spending. You can see their grants to various organizations at their website: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database. The recipients include the World Health Organization (WHO) (Gates is the top donor after the USA), the CDC Foundation (really), also companies such as Pfizer and ModernaTX, “BBC Media Action”, and many grants to “Imperial College London,” which originated the incredible Coronavirus death predictions from its computer modeling. There are a lot of grants to “Guardian News & Media Ltd.” for example. There are grants to many Canadian institutions (worth looking at). You can search the database.
That’s a lot of power. I imagine there are many doctors and scientists out there who are struggling mightily against the power of money to not utter the same gibberish 24/7 like politicians and journalists are doing in our Orwellian situation.
Continuing with the interview:
One of the areas of the Gates Foundation’s expertise, he says, is
“how you get a vaccine–making 7 billion of those is going to be an incredible challenge.”
9:30 Gates has the unelected authority to pick (at 9:50)
“which of the many vaccine efforts it’s worth putting a lot of money behind and building that manufacturing in parallel with the safety and advocacy work which is very difficult to do, probably will take about 18 months before we can get to a significant level.”
Notice the reference to “safety and advocacy”–the hard marketing work of convincing or scaring people into believing this hypothetical “vaccine” is “safe.”
Why assume there is only going to be only one vaccine anyway? Maybe there will be multiple products and variations. In a later July interview Gates talked about the “second generation” being much more effective, even implying that the first generation may not even work.
What is the point of risking it and taking it? Are these things going to be prescribed by doctors after being assessed? No. The same question could be asked about all the vaccines we’ve been subjected to for decades, especially as children. Why?
What would an “effective” vaccine do? Will it reduce or eliminate the particular virus, or all viruses of a certain kind? What about other viruses? If you still get cold/flu symptoms, what difference will it make to you in practice if you end up getting a cold for some other reason? The vulnerable are still vulnerable every year to flu and even to colds. I challenge the whole motivation for giving us a vaccine in the first place.
“You’re thinking 18 months even with all the work that you’ve already done to this point and the planning that you are taking with lots of different potential vaccinations . . . ?”
“There’s an approach called RNA vaccine that people like Moderna, CureVac and others are using that, in 2015, we’d identified that as very promising for pandemics and for other applications as well. If everything goes perfectly with the RNA approach, we could actually be at the 18 months. We don’t want to create unrealistic expectations.”
He even offers false hope (do human beings need vaccines, or do we good nutrition and protection from toxicity?) and then nullifies it –at 11:30:
“The efficacy of vaccines in older people is always a huge challenge. It turns out that the flu vaccine isn’t that effective in elderly people.”
Did you know that? Is it effective with anyone at all? Any evidence?
“Most of the benefit comes from younger people not spreading it because they’re vaccinated [any proof?] and that benefits on a community basis the elderly”
Here is this pretense that they care about the elderly who they failed to give proper treatment to after instituting COVID-19 death panels.
“Here, We clearly need a vaccine that works in the upper age range because they’re most at risk of that. Doing that so you amp it up so that it works in older people and yet you don’t have side effects, if we have 1 in 10,000 side effects, that’s way more, 700,000 people who will suffer from that.”
“So really understanding the safety at a gigantic scale across all age ranges pregnant, male, female, undernourished, existing comorbidities, it’s very, very hard and that actual decision of OK, let’s go and give this vaccine to the entire world, governments will have to be involved because there will be some risk and indemnification needed before that can be decided on.”
By “indemnifcation” I am sure he means that governments need to “hold harmless” the vaccine manufacturers (which the US government already does, at least with current childhood vaccines) and others involved in giving the vaccine to those who become injured and who seek compensation. (Articles on this:
Supreme Court Upholds Liability Shield For Vaccine Makers
Article on Canadian legal situation compared to U.S).
14:00 Gates is asked about “asymptomatic spread” and thinks the numbers 10-25% are too high. He says it’s very unlikely that there are a lot of asymptomatic people infecting people. But then he says it needs to be studied, so he ends up leaving this fear-mongering nonsense on the table for viewers to worry about along with all the rest. He refers to the “Seattle Coronavirus Assessment Network” who are studying this.
The idea is to leave us with the threat that there is this deadly virus out there–despite the actual numbers that show that the immune-compromised are the ones who are as vulnerable this year as in other years. Also, repeatedly in their propaganda, they put the lie to the idea they care about the elderly, because they introduced death panels (health care rationing policies) deliberately in March, 2020 to go along with the COVID-19 scare scenario. And more ended up dying as a result in a concentrated period of time in some jurisdictions–because they were kept out of hospitals and isolated and neglected in care homes! (See articles).
We don’t keel over because of viruses. We live with microbes all the time. And viruses spread no matter what we do. Whether we get sick or not depends on the health of our immune system. If economic conditions (and the pushing of plant-based foods) diminish the quality and quantity of our food supply, then we will be more susceptible to illness.
He is asked about serological testing and antibodies.
His advocacy of dicatorship includes the supposed need to trace contacts and quarantine.
Then he talks about how students are going into online learning or else can’t afford it.
20:00 Gates talks again about how there will be a lack of demand in the economy (because nobody will have anything).
He puts forward the idea of “potential therapeutics,” but he tries his best to dismiss the well known drug that has been censored by the media–as if it has only been used in a test tube. News about this has been censored and censorship by tyrants is the answer to every troublesome challenge.
At the end, referring to the “re-opening” he says sports activities were not OK. Manufacturing companies with strict protocols are OK. So he gives his input into whether the world gets to go outside and under what conditions. He talks about creating a testing regime.
As in other interviews, he is describing a new authoritarian economic and social system that has been slickly marketed to us. Instead of openly announcing this system, the oligarchy slowly introduces us to it using Bill Gates and others who talk like him.
Articles related to the topics mentioned in the interview
CureVac focuses on the development of mRNA-based coronavirus vaccine to protect people worldwide (originally: https://www.curevac.com/en/2020/03/15/curevac-focuses-on-the-development-of-mrna-based-coronavirus-vaccine-to-protect-people-worldwide/) | March 15, 2020
Canadian-made COVID-19 vaccine ready to start human trials soon CTVNews.ca | June 29, 2020
Update about the Canadian Dalhousie project:Canadian COVID-19 clinical trial scrapped after China wouldn’t ship potential vaccine CBC News | August 26, 2020
Canada’s Vaccine Industry Committee (important info on Canadian COVID-19 vaccine development)
The legal picture in Canada is discussed in this article: Vaccine compensation program overdue: experts This article asserts there is a small number of people who suffer from the very serious side effect described. What they are talking about is the need to introduce a “no-fault” system like in the US (does the U.S. have that for both children and adults?) This religious-like vaccine belief system is reinforced by this article despite the injury described. I doubt they actually follow up adequately with “patients” (no prescription, no need for a doctor even!?) to determine whether someone is injured or not by a vaccine–and I don’t think they are objective about cause and effect. I think they only have the reports made by some victims which are stored in the Canadian government’s adverse events database (like the U.S. has also).