Revised: January 28, 2023

Parts 1, 2, 3, 4

Continued from Part 4

The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it. Power is what all messiahs really seek: not the chance to serve.

—Minority Report: H.L. Mencken’s Notebooks (1956)

Free Trade

“Free trade” doesn’t refer to regular people being able to trade freely. After all, this document seeks to restrain our “consumption patterns.”

“Free trade” is for the benefit of internationalism–for international corporations–and refers to getting rid of barriers and restrictions that nations might decide to impose on trade–cancelling out national and local sovereignty and democratic decision-making.

These local and national restrictions might be for various reasons, legitimate or not, created out of concern for pollution, human rights, standard of living, culture and morality.

The Fabian socialist agenda, as described by H. G. Wells for example, has always praised the efficiency and sophistication of international capitalism.

Aldous Huxley’s novel Brave New World describes a world system of dictatorship that is a merger of capitalism and communism.

Reference to Free Trade in 33.6:

Economic conditions, both domestic and international, that encourage free trade and access to markets will help make economic growth and environmental protection mutually supportive for all countries, particularly for developing countries and countries undergoing the process of transition to a market economy (see chapter 2 for a fuller discussion of these issues).

Word Counts:
free trade: 1
access to markets: 6

Another example of “access to markets” from 2.2:

… if barriers restrict access to markets …

I think the term “market economy” needs more consideration. I think it refers to a skewed concept because I believe a common-sense, traditional understanding of human society is that societies–and economies– should be based on respect for laws and values–right and wrong, property rights, privacy–including free exchange also, land rights, sovereignty, democracy, human dignity, human rights, freedoms, access to resources, culture, tradition, etc.

Also, the economy should serve human beings. It should not be set up as a tool that manipulates us into working on large-scale projects using fear of poverty and debt as the motivator. Why shouldn’t work and the motivations for work be private considerations?

I’m not sure anyone ever considers this–because we are used to being dominated for hundreds of years by large, impersonal, monopolistic corporate entities in league with governments.

There are enough unowned resources to allow everyone to survive or live comfortably if they want to. Unowned land could easily be shared out to every family–and those who want to work harder and innovate would be free to do so.

The problem is that in a society that puts values and rights FIRST, projects that involve possibly contaminating the human body and land (private or collective property) might not be allowed to proceed. Historically, these rights were overridden, and farms, for example, and neighbourhoods, were contaminated in the name of the “greater good”–to allow for heavy pollution supposedly required for wars and heavy industry.

Vaccines and Immunization

Vaccines and immunization are repeatedly mentioned in Agenda 21, the United Nation’s plan for the 21st century.

For example, following the doctrinal assumption that vaccines are intended to prevent disease, one of the UN’s major goals in 6.12 is:

l. To accelerate research on improved vaccines and implement to the fullest extent possible the use of vaccines in the prevention of disease.

One of the related goals in 6.12 is:

b. By the year 2000, eradicate polio;

Another is 6.12.d:

By 1995, to reduce measles deaths by 95 per cent and reduce measles cases by 90 per cent compared with pre-immunization levels;

Related reports relevant to measles and the MMR (Measles Mumps Rubella) vaccine: here, here, and here.

Many reports clearly indicate that the polio vaccine has caused “polio” or vaccine-induced paralysis. See also here, here, here, and here.

Word count in Agenda 21:
vaccines: 9 instances
immunization: 4 instances

Vaccines are also an important feature of the later update to Agenda 21, Agenda 2030.

In light of COVID developments, I will quote the other statements:

6.13.a.iv:

Vaccines for the prevention of communicable diseases;

6.16:

National and regional training institutions should promote broad intersectoral approaches to prevention and control of communicable diseases, including training in epidemiology and community prevention and control, immunology, molecular biology and the application of new vaccines. …

16.5.g:

Develop improved diagnostic techniques and vaccines for the prevention and spread of diseases and for rapid assessment of toxins or infectious organisms in products for human use or livestock feed;

Relevant statements in 16.13:

e. Develop and make widely available new and improved vaccines against major communicable diseases that are efficient and safe and offer protection with a minimum number of doses, including intensifying efforts directed at the vaccines needed to combat common diseases of children;

f. Develop biodegradable delivery systems for vaccines that eliminate the need for present multiple-dose schedules, facilitate better coverage of the population and reduce the costs of immunization;

g. Develop effective biological control agents against disease-transmitting vectors, such as mosquitoes and resistant variants, taking account of environmental protection considerations;

That statement reminds me of the modified mosquito developments, which are possibly related. See here and here.

h. Using the tools provided by modern biotechnology, develop, inter alia, improved diagnostics, new drugs and improved treatments and delivery systems;

This calls to mind the mRNA delivery platform for therapies that has been used with COVID “vaccines.”

Medicinal plants are mentioned in 16.13.i but many statements are of the opposite, less natural persuasion, i.e, biotechnology.

Another reference to biotechnology is in 16.13.j:

Develop processes to increase the availability of materials derived from biotechnology, for use in improving human health.

Other statements on immunization:

6.3:

… promotion of health education, immunization and provision of essential drugs. …

6.27.a.i:

Strengthen basic health-care services for children in the context of primary healthcare delivery, including prenatal care, breast-feeding, immunization and nutrition programmes;

To understand the real reasons for mass vaccination, especially in light of COVID-19 events, see the 2010 Ted Talk by Bill Gates, see The Ghost in the Machine by Arthur Koestler and statements made by H. G. Wells.

Next:
Biotechnology

I think the statements in Agenda 21 on biotechnology–which is not a very “green” concept at all–are of considerable interest.

Word counts:
biotechnology: 65 instances
biotechnologies: 17 instances
biotechnological: 2 instances

To be continued in Part 6

---