Parts: 1, 2.
Continued from Part 1
Value for value: Donate to support this project.
The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it. Power is what all messiahs really seek: not the chance to serve.
Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030
Vaccines and immunization are repeatedly mentioned in Agenda 21, the United Nation’s plan from 1992 for the 21st century. For example, following the assumption that vaccines are intended to prevent disease, one of the UN’s major goals is stated in 6.12.1:
To accelerate research on improved vaccines and implement to the fullest extent possible the use of vaccines in the prevention of disease.
Vaccines are also an important feature of the later update to Agenda 21, Agenda 2030.
There are key goals related to use of biotechnology in Agenda 21:
Using the tools provided by modern biotechnology, develop, inter alia, improved diagnostics, new drugs and improved treatments and delivery systems;
Develop processes to increase the availability of materials derived from biotechnology, for use in improving human health.
Vaccines in the Context of Population, Modification and Control
TED talk by Bill Gates in 2010: Innovating to Zero: https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_innovating_to_zero
He uses the doctrine that human carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions cause climate change and that there is an urgent need to reduce the population.
First we’ve got population. Now, the world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent, but there we see an increase of about 1.3.
Lowering that number by 15 percent means reducing the population by one billion!
In parallel, Gates wants an 80 percent reduction in carbon dioxide and refers to carbon taxes, etc. in his talk:
For 2050, you’ve heard many people talk about this 80 percent reduction. That really is very important, that we get there. …
If you gave me only one wish for the next 50 years, I could pick who’s president, I could pick a vaccine, which is something I love, or I could pick that this thing that’s half the cost with no CO2 gets invented [his nuclear power proposal], this is the wish I would pick …
Gates refers to Geoengineering:
There is a line of research on what’s called geoengineering, which are various techniques that would delay the heating to buy us 20 or 30 years to get our act together. Now, that’s just an insurance policy. … there’s now the geoengineering discussion about, should that be in the back pocket in case things happen faster, or this innovation goes a lot slower than we expect.
The original About page (https://web.archive.org/web/20140316153815/https://www.ted.com/speakers/bill_gates) states the following regarding the philanthropy of Gates Foundation:
… Gates believes his tech-centric strategy for giving will prove the killer app of planet Earth’s next big upgrade. …
He is making an analogy to his years in software development. Note how “upgrade” calls to mind the Great Reset we learned about later in 2020.
Koestler refers to one of the literal mind control conferences he participated in, a 1961 symposium on Control of the Mind at the University of California San Francisco Medical Center (Ch. 18, p. 333).
He quotes another participant, Professor Holger Hydén of Goeteborg University who wrote the paper “Biochemical Aspects of Brain Activity”:
“In considering the problem of control of the mind, . . . : would it be possible to change the fundamentals of emotion by inducing molecular changes in the biologically active substances in the brain? The RNA, in particular, is the main target for such a speculation, since a molecular change of the RNA may lead to a change in the proteins being formed. . . . “
He points out there are both positive and negative aspects to the
“application of a substance changing the rate of production and composition of RNA and provoking enzyme changes in the functional units of the central nervous system”
The use of this particular substance increased “suggestibility.”
He notes that
“a defined change of such a functionally important substance as the RNA in the brain could be used for conditioning.”
He is referring to not just tricyano-aminopropene, but to
“any substance inducing changes of biologically important molecules in the neurons and the glia and affecting the mental state . . .. It is not difficult to imagine the possible uses to which a government in a police-controlled state could put this substance.”
At first they would
“subject the population to hard conditions. Suddenly the hardship would be removed, and at the same time, the substance would be added to the tap water and the mass-communications media turned on.”
Koestler comments that
“biochemistry can serve the powers of light or of darkness. Its dangers are terrifying; but we are now concerned with its beneficial possibilities.”
He quotes another participant of the “Control of the Mind” symposium, Dean Saunders, of the San Francisco Medical School who says that modern chemists have provided
“an abundant array of new chemical compounds of varying and diverse structure which influence the central nervous system to distort, accelerate, or depress the mental state and behavioural characteristics of the individual.”
There is a “very strong possibility” of
“a full spectrum of chemical agents which can be used for the control of the mind in the majority of its activities.”
“. . . Here at our disposal, to be used wisely or unwisely, is an increasing array of agents that manipulate human beings . . . It is now possible to act directly on the individual to modify his behaviour instead of as in the past, indirectly through modification of the environment. This, then, constitutes a part of what Aldous Huxley has called ‘The Final Revolution’ . . . ” (pp. 334-335)
Koestler advocates a hypothetical “mental stabiliser” (p. 337).
“In one way or the other, the mutation would get under way” (p. 338).
H. G. Wells writes about the principles that define his collectivist Open Conspiracy, and one of these is the
practical recognition of the necessity for world biological controls, for example, of population and disease.
— H. G. Wells, “The Open Conspiracy,” from The Open Conspiracy and Other Writings, 1933, Waterlow & Sons Ltd., London. Page 72.
Reports about other Vaccines
Measles among vaccinated Quebec kids questioned
Canadian Press, CBC News | 20 October 2011
. . . An investigation into an outbreak in a high school in a town that was heavily hit by the virus found that about half of the cases were in teens who had received the recommended two doses of vaccine in childhood — in other words, teens whom authorities would have expected to have been protected from the measles virus. . . .
… Petitioners alleged that as a result of “all the vaccinations administered to [Ryan] from March 25, 2003, through February 22, 2005, and more specifically, measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccinations administered to him on December 19, 2003 and May 10, 2004,” Ryan
suffered “a severe and debilitating injury to his brain, described as Autism Spectrum Disorder (‘ASD’).” Petition at 1. Petitioners specifically asserted that Ryan “suffered a Vaccine Table Injury, namely, an encephalopathy” as a result of his receipt of the MMR vaccination on December 19, 2003. Id. In the alternative, petitioners asserted that “as a cumulative result of his receipt of each and every vaccination between March 25, 2003 and February 22, 2005, Ryan has suffered . . . neuroimmunologically mediated dysfunctions in the form of asthma and ASD. …
On June 9, 2011, respondent filed a supplemental report pursuant to Vaccine Rule 4(c) stating it was respondent’s view that Ryan suffered a Table injury under the Vaccine Act – namely, an encephalitis within five to fifteen days following receipt of the December 19, 2003 MMR vaccine, see 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a)(III)(B), and that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Vaccine Program …
Unanswered Questions from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: A Review of Compensated Cases of Vaccine-Induced Brain Injury
PDF of full report
PACE Environmental Law Review | January 2011
… This preliminary study suggests that the VICP [Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in the U.S.] has been compensating cases of vaccine-induced encephalopathy and residual seizure disorder associated with autism since the inception of the program. Through this preliminary study, the authors have found eighty-three cases of autism among those compensated for vaccine-induced brain damage. …
By John E. Greenlee, MD, University of Utah Health | Last review/revision Mar 2022 | Modified Sep 2022
Encephalitis is inflammation of the parenchyma of the brain, resulting from direct viral invasion or occurring as a postinfectious immunologic complication caused by a hypersensitivity reaction to a virus or another foreign protein. Symptoms include fever, headache, and altered mental status, often accompanied by seizures or focal neurologic deficits …
Encephalitis can occur as a secondary immunologic complication of certain viral infections or vaccinations. …
The following peer-reviewed papers support the findings of the original work by Wakefield and colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital in the UK … [long list]
Panel rules MMR vaccine left young girl partially deaf | 20 August 2012
a 21-year-old Scottish woman, Katie Stephen, suffered from deafness in one ear due to an adverse reaction to the triple MMR (Measles, Mumps and Rubella) vaccine, which she was given at the age of 15 months.
Original Daily Mail article with content is still on web.archive.org: Panel rules MMR jab made girl deaf – but not enough for payout
A woman has won her fight to prove she was left deaf by the MMR jab – only the second time it has been linked to disability.
But a medical assessment panel ruled Katie Stephen, 21, will not receive compensation …
Daily Mail article is missing content but still has title “Panel rules MMR jab made girl deaf – but not enough for payout” (move mouse to top of browser tab to see title)
Italian court rules MMR vaccine did trigger autism | 8 May 2012
Original news report in Italian: Autismo. Tribunale di Rimini: “Colpa del vaccino”. Ministero condannato a pagare indennizzo
Family win 18 year fight over MMR damage to son: £90,000 payout is first since concerns over vaccine surfaced
Daily Mail Online | 28 August 2010
A mother whose son suffered severe brain damage after he was given the controversial MMR vaccine as a baby has been awarded £90,000 compensation.
The judgment is the first of its kind to be revealed since concerns were raised about the safety of the triple jab.
Robert Fletcher, 18, is unable to talk, stand unaided or feed himself.
. . .
The Gates Foundation funded a campaign to eradicate polio. As a result of this campaign, from 2000 to 2017, in India, there were estimated to be an additional 491,000 cases of children with non-polio acute flaccid paralysis caused by the vaccine. In February 2017, the Indian government cut ties with the Gates Foundation and ended its control over the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization.
There have been outbreaks of vaccine-derived polio elsewhere:
Polio programme: let us declare victory and move on.
Indian J Med Ethics. 2012 Apr-Jun;9(2):114-7
Vashisht N, Puliyel J.
Department of Paediatrics, St Stephens Hospital, Delhi
PubMed – NCBI, PMID: 22591873
It was hoped that following polio eradication, immunisation could be stopped. However the synthesis of polio virus in 2002, made eradication impossible. It is argued that getting poor countries to expend their scarce resources on an impossible dream over the last 10 years was unethical. Furthermore, while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of primum-non-nocere was violated. . . .
. . . January 12, 2012, marked a significant milestone for India. It was the first anniversary of the last reported wild polio case from India. Keeping the country free of polio for a whole year was a feat that is a tribute to the Government of India and its 2.3 million vaccinators, who visited over 200 million households to ensure that the nearly 170 million children (under five years in age) were repeatedly immunised with oral polio vaccine OPV) (1). India’s programme has largely been self financed. The country has thus far spent more than Rs 120 billion (US$2.5 billion US$ 1 = Rs 50) on polio eradication after the programme started here in 1994 (2). The $2.5 billion spent by India must be seen against $2 billion spent by the United States of America on world-wide polio eradication (3), the $1.3 billion expended by Bill Gates (4), and the $0.8 billion raised by the loudest voice for polio eradication – Rotary International – over the last 20 years (5). . . .
. . . The charade about polio eradication and the great savings it will bring has persisted to date. It is a paradox, that while the director general of WHO, Margret Chan, and Bill Gates are trying to muster support for polio eradication (22) it has been known to the scientific community, for over 10 years, that eradication of polio is impossible. . . .
Polio surge in Nigeria after vaccine virus mutates
By Maria Cheng, Associated Press | August 14, 2009
“…Polio, the dreaded paralyzing disease stamped out in the industrialized world, is spreading in Nigeria. And health officials say in some cases, it’s caused by the vaccine used to fight it.”
“In July, the World Health Organization issued a warning that this vaccine-spread virus might extend beyond Africa. So far, 124 Nigerian children have been paralyzed this year — about twice those afflicted in 2008.
“The polio problem is just the latest challenge to global health authorities trying to convince wary citizens that vaccines can save them from dreaded disease. …”
Then she talks about “misguided fears” and “myths” about vaccines, that for some reason people believe the population-obsessed United Nations wants to kill off or sterilize Africans.
“In 2007, health experts reported that amid Nigeria’s ongoing outbreak of wild polio viruses, 69 children had also been paralyzed in a new outbreak caused by the mutation of a vaccine’s virus.
“Back then, WHO said the vaccine-linked outbreak would be swiftly overcome — yet two years later, cases continue to mount. They have since identified polio cases linked to the vaccine dating back as far as 2005.”
“… For every case of paralysis, there are hundreds of other children who don’t develop symptoms, but pass on the disease.”
“… Some experts now say that once viruses from vaccines start circulating they can become just as dangerous as wild viruses…”
Associated Press article: “Polio surge in Nigeria after vaccine virus mutates”
by Maria Cheng, August 14, 2009, The San Diego Union-Tribune.
The 2009 announcement from the World Health Organization:
Polio in Nigeria
17 JULY 2009 – In 2009, the northern states of Nigeria have experienced a large polio outbreak due to wild poliovirus type 3 (WPV3) with 258 cases, compared to 32 cases for the same period in 2008. WPV3 from northern Nigeria has this year spread internationally to Niger. Since February 2009, there has also been an increasing number of polio cases due to a type 2 circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV2) in northern Nigeria (103 cases to date in 2009 compared to 31 cases for the same period in 2008). Both serotypes are at continued, and in the case of the cVDPV2 increasing, risk of international spread. While the number of cVDPV2 cases is lower than WPV3 cases, circulation of this serotype is of particular international concern as the last case of polio due to a circulating wild poliovirus type 2 (WPV2) was in 1999. . . .
http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/203/7/898.full “Outbreak of Type 2 Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus in Nigeria: Emergence and Widespread Circulation in an Underimmunized Population” by Steven Wassilak et al., Journal of Infectious Diseases. J Infect Dis. (2011) 203 (7): 898-909. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiq140
. . . The cornerstone of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative is immunization of children with multiple doses of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV), via both routine immunization (RI) and supplementary immunization activities (SIAs). . . .
Despite its advantages, OPV use carries the infrequent risks of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis among OPV recipients and their direct contacts and the emergence of genetically divergent vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs), both a consequence of selection against the attenuated phenotype during intestinal replication. . . .
The head polio “eradication” official at WHO, Canadian Bruce Aylward, is quoted by AP saying it’s “very disturbing.”
Another Active Gates Project: Releasing Genetically Modified Mosquitoes
To be continued: Part 3